A meeting of the civil and military leadership chaired by Prime Minister Imran Khan reviewed the overall situation in the country and expressed deep concern over the senseless killing of a Sri Lankan citizen in Sialkot. The meeting was attended security by Chief of Army Staff , National Security Advisor, Information Minister, Interior, Punjab Chief Minister and other civil and military officials. They vowed to bring the perpetrators to justice.
According to the Prime Minister's Office, the participants in the security meeting were of the view that mobs and individuals could not be allowed to take the law into their own hands. In a meeting chaired by Prime Minister Imran Khan, the civilian and military leadership expressed deep concern over the senseless killing of a Sri Lankan citizen and stressed the need for a clear strategy to prevent such incidents. And all those involved should be punished. Participants praised the courageous act of Malik Adnan, Kumara's ally in the worst case scenario, who tried to save his comrade by putting himself in trouble amidst the angry mob. Some of the reasons for the rise of extremism in the people are also here, but the overall reasons are as follows. Not knowing the facts. If the teachings of the Book and Sunnah are a source of guidance and there is no doubt about it, then its teachings and instructions are beyond temporal and spatial constraints, it is possible to follow them at all times and in all places. Due to their ignorance and lack of knowledge, they are partially or completely unable to adapt the texts from the point of view of real jurisprudence, which makes it difficult for them to adhere to the path of moderation. The example of change in the strategies and methods adopted by the government on the basis of occasion and need is clear. It may be said that if Abraham (peace be upon him) started his da'wah by demolishing the idols, then the Prophet (peace be upon him) ended his da'wah by demolishing the idols. The scholars do not know the truth. Religious and political party adherence to religious restrictions also prevents them from staying on the path of moderation because sometimes party policies get in the way. Although the existence of student faith has existed since the beginning and the history of the Muslim world has witnessed this attitude. The scholars were all preserved in the pages of history in this regard and the same thing has happened to some scholars in the present time too, the loss of which was borne by the scholars themselves that Islam defended the opinion of a person. It becomes very difficult to adhere to the clear and definite rules and regulations of Islam. As a result, its effects reached the masses. As a result, the masses, following in the footsteps of these Ulema, became entangled in the poison of individualism. Unnecessary fatwa by the party also harmed the ranks of the scholars and this fatwa was not based on mere jurisprudential issues but went beyond jurisprudential issues and reached the level of beliefs after which the scholars of the opposing sect in general Fatwas such as polytheism, heresy, immorality, immorality, arrogance, infidelity and especially the scholars of the same sect became the target of such extremism. The real question is whether there is a need for a leader to issue Fatwas on the basis of uncompromising and highly aggressive rhetoric and not to think about the effect of his Fatwas on the people. These Fatwas based on extremism have caused the most damage. The self-righteous class has been divided into two factions. The use of words and tactics based on the manifestations of aggression and extremism in fatwa and the use of expressions that gives rise to extremism and so coincidentally slow down the practice. It is slowly increasing the use of social media by enthusiasm. the Ulema as they use the style of discourse during teaching or in the general religious gatherings is full of One of the reasons why scholars are suffering from extremism is that in response to the fatwa of prejudice and invalidation of scholars of other sects in the name of narrow-mindedness and support of one's own sect. The same procedure was followed. They are also looking at the consequences. Therefore, they used to adopt the method of error as much as possible. They were caught in Takfir and this act was also a deviation from the path of moderation and the method of the middle Ummah and its worst effect was on the people that they too became practitioners of this practice. In which the deceit, deception and accusatory style of the opponent was to be adopted which caused severe damage to their position and status. Exceeding the limits of even the most vain comments on personalities and housewives can be seen frequently on social media, print media and electronic media. To be influenced by a subject in a war-torn society and to limit one's religious status with this in mind, there is no problem in giving a polite response, but it is impossible to adopt the style of modern political activists and adhere to moderation. The existence of scholars is based on Masood's knowledge. It has been made clear that it is not a matter of acquiring Islamic sciences that the acquisition of Islamic sciences is correct only on the basis of its traditional characteristics but modern inventions have practically removed the scholars from the sources and references which The downside is that the connection with books is breaking down and modern inventions are helpful as a source of knowledge. While searching for the desired topics in book reading as well as other useful points keep coming to the fore whereas in the case of modern inventions only the required information comes to the fore and the relevant information does not come to the fore due to which It is not possible to pay homage to any subject. Scholars in the background of reading books One of the reasons why extremism is so prevalent is that one should read only books in support of one's position and even if one reads the books of the opponents, one should find flaws in it and refute it. In any case, it does not befit the religious scholar that he is with the argument, but if he studies on a limited basis, then on that basis, it automatically seems to be correct and everything else seems to be erroneous and wrong. The elements are consciously and unconsciously exposed to extremism. There are some elements in the society which are spreading extremist ideas in the name of Islam in the society in which the leading liberal fascists are the ones who have every beard, hat and doer. Looks like an extremist or a terrorist. And our media, under an unknown agenda, is engaged in convincing the world that adherence to Islam is the only religion that gives rise to extremism and terrorism. Intolerance is on the rise and people are judging themselves.
0 Comments